【is kris kristofferson a rhodes scholar】What Does Success Look Like for a Climate Czar?
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- President-elect Joe Biden’s decision to create a new cabinet-level position for climate-related issues — and to choose so prominent a figure as former Secretary of State John Kerry to fill it — demonstrates Biden’s sincerity over putting climate at the very center of U.S. foreign policy. It is is kris kristofferson a rhodes scholareasy to understate the importance of this appointment, given the flurry of czars created by most new administrations.
However, if Kerry’s position works as intended, this could mark the beginning of a significant transformation of U.S. foreign policy. It won’t be easy: Such a shift goes against the grain of how foreign policy has traditionally been formulated and executed.
Taking climate more seriously means going far beyond simply rejoining the Paris accords and participating fully in other international forums related to climate. It means integrating climate policy into all aspects of foreign policy and marshaling many instruments of U.S. national power — economic, diplomatic and rhetorical — to coerce, compel and incentivize countries to address climate change.
Given the seriousness of the challenge, one can make a strong case that this shift is long overdue. Yet, placing decarbonization at the heart of U.S. foreign policy will have repercussions well beyond climate change, potentially altering the geopolitical landscape in fundamental ways.
Realistically, there is a finite number of issues the U.S. has the bandwidth and leverage to work in any bilateral or multilateral relationship, and a focus on climate will likely come at the expense of advancing more traditional national-security issues such as nonproliferation, counterterrorism and possibly human-rights advocacy.
This is not simply a question of walking and chewing gum at the same time. Tradeoffs are inherent in national security. Balancing foreign-policy priorities can involve fraught choices — an extreme example being how the U.S. turned a blind eye to Pakistan’s nuclear pursuits in order to secure its support in repelling the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s. The Biden administration will face similar dilemmas as it elevates climate to the top of its global concerns.
One relationship where two of its high priorities will come into conflict is that with Saudi Arabia. Alongside climate, the Biden team promises to put a renewed emphasis on human rights and respect for democracy. Biden has pledged to hold a “Summit of Democracies” early in his presidency. On the campaign trail, Biden vowed to treat the Saudis like “the pariah that they are.”
Story continues
However, a foreign policy that makes a top priority of climate would recognize the importance of working with potential spoilers such as the Saudis, and ensuring that they have a stake in a successful energy transition. The U.S. would need to invest itself in the success of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 — the blueprint for diversifying the country’s economy away from oil — not undermine it.
As of now, most foreign-policy professionals are new to the idea that climate should be infused into their every interaction. Environmental issues have been seen more as “an issue-area expertise” than as an essential competency for every national-security expert. That will need to change.
Another challenge will be the link between how aggressively U.S. leaders can push the climate issue abroad in relation to the extent of progress made at home.
There is always a connection between domestic and international policy, but here it is particularly prominent. For instance, the world will be looking for the U.S. not only to rejoin the Paris Agreement, but to put forward a much more ambitious “national determined contribution” — the individual pledge made by each nation on greenhouse gas emissions. A credible one will require significant action at home, beyond even the measures such as the Barak Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan.
Likewise, a foreign policy on climate-turbo will need to involve intensive efforts to convince developing countries to abandon coal plants that are still economically viable. Yet doing so will be nearly impossible unless the U.S. can demonstrate similar measures within its own borders.
Quite apart from the execution of diplomacy, this drive to put climate at the heart of global interactions will also create challenges for policy formulation.
Many questions remain about how this new post will fit into the traditional bureaucracy. Two models — one formal and one informal — seem possible. The first is the position of the director of national intelligence, created at the recommendation of the 9/11 Commission to coordinate the more than a dozen intelligence agencies existing and overlapping within the U.S. government. Many who have worked inside them would agree that more coordination was necessary, but would also admit that this post took years to find its footing, and is less powerful than the technically subservient director of the CIA in some respects.
The second potential model is the Office of the Vice President under Dick Cheney. Cheney became arguably the most powerful vice president in history, not only by the force of his personality and longstanding relationships. He also expanded the traditionally skeletal staff of the vice president to a size that allowed his office to be omnipresent in the interagency process. In most every meeting convened by the National Security Council, Cheney’s staff played a prominent role, putting forward opinions and proposals that others knew to take seriously.
It is easy to see how parallels will be drawn, particularly if Kerry’s staff — likely to be of significant size — is placed in the White House.
The jobs of national security advisor and secretary of state will be altered — both positively and negatively — by the existence of a cabinet-level climate czar. The national security advisor will need to resolve heated debates over conflicting priorities. The secretary of state will need to coordinate closely with the climate team to ensure that foreign counterparts — most prominently the Chinese — are not able to pit parts of the U.S. government against itself. The people in these two posts, and those serving them, will spend significant time both harnessing and deflecting the power of Kerry and his team.
All this may give the impression that the climate czar is an unnecessary creation, bound to complicate the smooth workings of a foreign-policy team that needs to move quickly in a troubled and complex world.
The opposite seems more likely: That Biden created this position precisely because the bureaucratic hurdles and execution challenges of making climate change central to U.S. foreign policy will be so great. Moreover, Kerry is likely the appropriate pick for the job, given the stature and stamina that will be required to do it successfully.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Meghan L. O’Sullivan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. She is a professor of international affairs at Harvard’s Kennedy School, the North American chair of the Trilateral Commission, and a member of the board of directors of the Council on Foreign Relations and the board of Raytheon Technologies Corp. She served on the National Security Council from 2004 to 2007.
For more articles like this, please visit us at
bloomberg.com/opinion
Subscribe now
to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
View comments
-
Buying a House? 4 Things to Take Off Your Must-Have List NowResolutions 2019: Crush Your Debt in 3 Simple StepsKKR becomes latest buyout heavyweight to suffer 4Q lossesTom Brady Announces NFL Retirement: 'This Is Difficult for Me... 'Sonoco Implementing Price Increases for All Rigid Paper Containers and Closures'Grossing Up' and 'Seller Concessions': Advice for SponsorsThe Week Ahead – Private Sector PMI, U.S Nonfarm Payrolls, and Central Banks in Focus‘That Was Hard’: Ewan McGregor Reflects On Massive Backlash Against ‘Star Wars’ PrequelsBRIEF-My Heart Bodibra Group Ltd Sees Increase In Loss For Nine MonthsInfighting Between Lanier and Objectors Over Fees Roils Hip Implant Litigation
下一篇:A village of tiny Victorian homes offers a life-changing experience
- ·Fortuna to Release Third Quarter 2020 Financial Results on November 12, 2020; Conference Call at 12 p.m. Eastern Time on November 13, 2020
- ·Apple's iPhone sales leave investors feeling sour as they wait to hear from the Fed
- ·Russia's domestic gas supplies from Exxon-led project suspended - ministry
- ·Will Hi-P International Limited’s (SGX:H17) Earnings Grow In The Next Couple Of Years?
- ·CORRECTED-Fed's Evans says U.S. should support workers who lose pay if coronavirus worsens
- ·European shares start 2019 shakily as China, EU figures deepen gloom
- ·BRIEF-Ronshine China Holdings Posts January Total Contracted Sales Of About Rmb7.51 Bln
- ·BRIEF-Rubberex Corporation Announces Proposal To Dispose Manufacturing Operations In China For Total Cash Consideration Of 71.6 Million RGT
- ·Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. to Host Earnings Call
- ·DASAN Zhone Solutions, Inc. (DZSI) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript
- ·Are Avenir Telecom S.A.’s (EPA:AVT) High Returns Really That Great?
- ·How Much Did CSE Global Limited's (SGX:544) CEO Pocket Last Year?
- ·Mitch Gould and Nutritional Products International Welcome Record-Shattering GDP for Third Quarter
- ·Becerra and Other Democratic State AGs Appeal Ruling Killing ACA
- ·Assaulting His Mother Cost This Attorney the Ability to Practice for 1 Year
- ·Fed policy turn not good news for Trump as risks mount
- ·EyePoint Pharmaceuticals (EYPT) Reports Q4 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates
- ·Lady Gaga Fires Back At Donald Trump’s Campaign After They Try To Turn Her Biden Support Into A Liability
- ·Keanu Reeves and co-star Ana de Armas have fun in Instagram snaps
- ·AP Top Extended Financial Headlines at 11:58 p.m. EST
- ·U.S. Dollar Index (DX) Futures Technical Analysis – Overtaking 97.470 Could Trigger Surge into 97.920
- ·Should You Be Excited About The Ensign Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ENSG) 16% Return On Equity?
- ·Meet the 2012 AFI FEST Filmmakers #7: ‘Starlet’ Director Sean Baker
- ·BRIEF-Kong Sun Holdings Says Expects Unaudited Consol Profit Attributable To Owners Of Co To Decrease
- ·Bill.com Holdings Inc (BILL) President and CEO Rene A. Lacerte Sold $1.2 million of Shares
- ·U.S. State Department bans business with Cuban bank BFI
- ·Uber in advanced talks to sell air taxi unit: Axios
- ·Weyerhaeuser: 4Q Earnings Snapshot
- ·JPMorgan Turns Bullish On Sirius XM As Pandora Deal Nears Completion
- ·Stocks - Wall Street Mixed With Jobs Data Strong
- ·HAGENS BERMAN, NATIONAL TRIAL ATTORNEYS, Encourages VMware (VMW) Investors Who Have Suffered Significant Losses to Contact its Attorneys: Securities Fraud Class Action Deadlines Established
- ·Design Capital Limited (HKG:1545) Earns A Nice Return On Capital Employed
- ·EU and UK markets watchdogs agree pacts in case of no deal Brexit
- ·Here's Why We're Not Too Worried About IMPACT Silver's (CVE:IPT) Cash Burn Situation
- ·InvestmentPitch Media Video Discusses Recent eResearch Buy Recommendation on Peak Positioning Technologies, Parent Company of a Group of FinTech Subsidiaries operating in China - Video Available on Investmentpitch.com
- ·Federal Courts in Ga. Continue Operations as Shutdown Continues